Leaderboard Β· All comparisons Β· LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

NVIDIA A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 for AI

Device pages: NVIDIA A40 Β· NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA A40 scores 1.15x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 overall (Training 1.15x, Inference 1.03x, Compute 1.47x).

Scores on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Ratio = the A40's score divided by the RTX 3080's
ScoreRatioA40RTX 3080
Overall (GT)1.15x184.52160.52
Training1.15x187.96163.70
Inference1.03x248.17240.49
Compute1.47x95.4164.77

Per Model and Precision

Sustained throughput per model and precision; ratio = A40 / RTX 3080
ModelPrecisionRatioA40RTX 3080
compute
Dense MatMulBF161.99x146.4673.72
Dense MatMulFP162.02x144.1171.21
Dense MatMulFP321.91x209.02109.63
Dense MatMulFP641.04x3.483.34
Sparse MatMulFP321.11x84.8976.72
Sparse MatMulFP641.10x58.8053.43
inference
DistilBERTFP161.32x527.07398.20
DistilBERTFP8n/anot runnot run
DistilBERTINT81.00x277.68278.09
DistilGPT2FP161.29x523.46404.76
DistilGPT2FP8n/anot runnot run
DistilGPT2INT81.06x248.53235.15
Flan-T5 SmallFP161.24x640.51515.98
Flan-T5 SmallFP8n/anot runnot run
Flan-T5 SmallINT80.85x286.79338.76
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP160.83x182.67220.48
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP8n/anot runnot run
GraphGPS (Peptides)INT80.85x98.21115.37
MobileNetV3FP160.88x682.36775.12
MobileNetV3INT80.89x190.06213.32
training
DistilBERTBF161.36x290.50213.29
DistilBERTFP321.46x368.16252.88
DistilGPT2BF161.16x162.03139.11
DistilGPT2FP321.31x283.93216.26
Flan-T5 SmallBF161.08x131.34122.02
Flan-T5 SmallFP321.19x240.41201.41
GraphGPS (Peptides)BF160.95x89.4593.72
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP321.14x88.5277.55
MobileNetV3BF160.97x150.47155.13
MobileNetV3FP320.90x217.79242.26

Related Comparisons

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

Measure your own machine: pip install lynxbench-ai Β· Install guide β†’

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 faster than the NVIDIA A40 for AI?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 scores 1.09x the NVIDIA A40 overall (Training 0.82x, Inference 1.20x, Compute 1.62x). It leads on Inference and Compute and trails on Training.
Where is the difference between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and the NVIDIA A40 largest?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the ratio is highest on Sparse MatMul at FP64 (Compute), where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 scores 4.91x the NVIDIA A40, and lowest on Dense MatMul at FP32 (Compute), at 0.49x.
Which precisions run on only one of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 and the NVIDIA A40?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 runs FP8 inference; a precision a device cannot execute scores zero.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started