AI infrastructure and production SaaS

Cost-cuts, eval harnesses, runtime porting, and LLM evidence packs for SaaS teams running real production workloads.

Start a conversation Tell us the workload
arrow icon

You ship a product with an AI feature or two. It works in the demo, in CI, and at the design-partner stage — then production usage grows and the cost line, the latency tail, the model-swap question, or the on-call incident catches up. The team that knows your customers best is rarely the team free to absorb a serving-stack rebuild or a runtime migration. That gap is where we work.

Start a conversation Tell us the workload
arrow icon
Production server and network infrastructure
GPU compute hardware running an inference workload

Where AI Work Gets Stuck in Production

Two failure shapes recur. The inference bill grows faster than usage and a model release stalls because the unit economics no longer work — or an AI feature passed launch, drifted, and now shows up as a customer ticket rather than a dashboard alert.

The other shape is reach. A model needs to run somewhere it does not run today — a new accelerator, an edge device, the browser — or procurement, a security review, or a board-level governance question needs structured evidence of which model does which task and why, not a slide deck.

Four Ways We Engage

Four Packs Built for SaaS Teams

Cost, reliability, portability, and trust are different engineering problems with different failure modes, so we run each as a separate fixed-scope engagement — every one ending in a deliverable your team can re-run without us.

Cost pillar

Inference Cost-Cut Pack

Cost

Profile-first cost and p95-latency cuts inside the serving stack on the workload you actually run.

Reliability pillar

Production AI Monitoring Harness

Reliability

Eval harness, slice-level regression, drift checks, and release gates that catch the regression before a customer does.

Portability pillar

AI Porting & Deployment Pack

Portability

Get the workload running on a new accelerator, edge device, or browser, with a benchmark and runbook on the target.

Trust pillar

LLM Selection Pack

Trust

The eval suite and structured comparison an approval committee can sign against, with a re-run script for every model swap.

Production Inference Cost & Latency

The cheapest AI-cost wins are usually inside the serving stack, not in the model. We profile the workload first — batch sizes, caching, routing, quantisation, kernel choices, serving topology — and surface the changes that move the unit-economics line on the requests you actually run.

Lands in the Inference Cost-Cut Pack — 4–8 weeks, milestone or fixed-price.

Engineer profiling GPU inference performance
Evaluation results dashboard for a production model

Production Reliability & the Eval Harness

Most production regressions are not model-accuracy problems — they are missing evals, missing release gates, missing drift checks, or a workflow that turns a model-version bump into a customer ticket. We build the production-side infrastructure that catches the regression before the customer does.

Lands in the Production AI Monitoring Harness — 4–10 weeks, milestone or fixed-price.

Runtime, Browser & Silicon Porting

A model that runs on the training cluster is not the same artefact as one that runs on the device, the browser, or a constrained edge box. When the AI path on the target does not exist yet, we run a gated feasibility → porting engagement that ends with a working workload, a benchmark on the target, and a runbook your team can re-run.

Lands in the AI Porting & Deployment Pack — feasibility 2–4 weeks, porting of one workload 4–10 weeks, target-dependent.

AI workload running on an edge device
Approval committee reviewing model-comparison evidence

LLM Selection & Approval Evidence

Procurement, customer security, and board-level governance increasingly ask the same thing: which model, on which task, with what evidence? We build the eval suite and the structured comparison the approval committee can sign against — and the reproducible re-run script that turns the next model swap into a rerun rather than a fresh engagement.

Lands in the LLM Selection Pack — 3–6 weeks, fixed-price.

Areas of Expertise

Serving-Stack Cost Optimisation
GPU Profiling
Eval Harness Engineering
Slice-Level Regression
Drift Detection
Runtime & Silicon Porting
LLM Evaluation
Approval-Evidence Packs

Featured Case Studies

Production AI engineering, from GPU inference performance modelling to cross-API porting and LLM architecture comparison.

Case-Study: Performance Modelling of AI Inference on GPUs

Case-Study: Performance Modelling of AI Inference on GPUs

May 15, 2023

How TechnoLynx modelled AI inference performance across GPU architectures — delivering two tools (topology-level performance predictor and OpenCL GPU…

Read more
MLOps vs LLMOps: Let's simplify things

MLOps vs LLMOps: Let's simplify things

Nov 25, 2024

MLOps vs LLMOps: where the LLM lifecycle genuinely diverges from classical ML and where it reuses the same primitives.

Read more

Featured Articles

Capacity planning for inference, retrieval architecture for enterprise search, and the inference-engine layer underneath both.

Production Capacity Planning for AI Inference Fleets

Production Capacity Planning for AI Inference Fleets

May 13, 2026

AI inference capacity planning anchors to saturation-curve measurements under the SLO, not nameplate throughput.

Read more
Enterprise AI Search: Why Retrieval Architecture Matters More Than Model Choice

Enterprise AI Search: Why Retrieval Architecture Matters More Than Model Choice

May 5, 2026

Enterprise AI search quality depends on chunking and retrieval design more than the LLM. Bad retrieval plus a strong LLM yields confident wrong answers.

Read more
What an Inference Engine Is — and How It Shapes the Port Decision

What an Inference Engine Is — and How It Shapes the Port Decision

Jun 12, 2026

An inference engine is the layer that turns a trained model plus inputs into predictions.

Read more
2019
Founded in
95%+
Client Satisfaction Rate
20+
Successful Projects Delivered

Client Testimonials

Production SaaS AI Engineering FAQ

Why profile the workload before swapping the model or moving cloud?

+

The cheapest production-AI savings usually live inside the serving stack — batch sizes, caching, routing, quantisation, kernel choices, serving topology — not in the model. We measure the workload first and surface the changes that move the unit-economics line on the requests you actually run, with a measured baseline and a defensible delta rather than a vendor pitch.

How do you catch an AI feature that regresses silently in production?

+

Most production-AI regressions are not model-accuracy problems — they are missing evals, missing release gates, or a model-version bump that turns into a customer ticket instead of a dashboard alert. We build the eval harness, slice-level regression coverage, drift checks, and release gates that surface the regression before the customer does.

What does it take to run our model on a new accelerator, edge device, or the browser?

+

A model that runs on the training cluster is a different artefact from one that runs on the device, the browser, or a constrained edge box. When the AI path on the target does not exist yet, we run a gated feasibility → porting engagement that ends with a working workload, a benchmark on the target, and a runbook your team can re-run.

What evidence does an LLM procurement or security review actually need?

+

Procurement, customer security, and board-level governance ask the same thing: which model, on which task, with what evidence? We build the eval suite and the structured comparison an approval committee can sign against, plus a reproducible re-run script that turns the next model swap into a rerun rather than a fresh engagement.

How is a fixed-scope pack different from buying engineer-weeks?

+

A pack has a fixed scope, a price tied to the outcome, and ends in a deliverable your team keeps and can re-run — a benchmark replay, an eval re-run script, a deployment runbook, an evidence map. We do not sell engineer-weeks against a backlog; if the question you need to close does not match a pack, we say so.

How We Work With SaaS Teams

Each pack has a fixed scope and a price tied to the outcome, and ends in something your team keeps and can re-run — a benchmark replay, an eval re-run script, a deployment runbook, an evidence map. We do not sell engineer-weeks against a backlog; if the question you need to close does not match a pack, we say so.

Heading into a cost review, a reliability incident, a new deployment target, or an LLM approval? The named pack page is the entry point — or contact us with the question itself and we will route you to the right one.

Start a conversation Tell us the workload
arrow icon
Engineer working on a production AI deployment