Leaderboard Β· All comparisons Β· LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

DGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 for AI

Device pages: DGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10) Β· NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the DGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10) scores 1.13x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 overall (Training 1.12x, Inference 1.18x, Compute 1.03x).

Scores on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Ratio = the DGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10)'s score divided by the RTX 4060's
ScoreRatioDGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10)RTX 4060
Overall (GT)1.13x119.69106.26
Training1.12x92.1681.93
Inference1.18x182.32154.96
Compute1.03x84.6782.26

Per Model and Precision

Sustained throughput per model and precision; ratio = DGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10) / RTX 4060
ModelPrecisionRatioDGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10)RTX 4060
compute
Dense MatMulBF162.93x176.1660.09
Dense MatMulFP162.91x173.4059.51
Dense MatMulFP323.07x154.7450.46
Dense MatMulFP641.86x3.011.62
Sparse MatMulFP320.40x62.65155.55
Sparse MatMulFP640.33x48.51146.47
inference
DistilBERTFP161.53x347.13226.96
DistilBERTFP81.30x185.12142.44
DistilBERTINT81.04x141.54136.64
DistilGPT2FP161.50x300.91200.54
DistilGPT2FP81.23x153.69125.43
DistilGPT2INT81.04x133.00128.30
Flan-T5 SmallFP161.53x467.15304.88
Flan-T5 SmallFP81.18x242.60205.70
Flan-T5 SmallINT80.86x146.05169.75
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP160.97x89.6892.03
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP80.93x43.9647.11
GraphGPS (Peptides)INT80.88x40.7846.56
MobileNetV3FP161.11x407.57365.84
MobileNetV3INT80.90x90.32100.37
training
DistilBERTBF161.33x140.71105.77
DistilBERTFP321.59x210.57132.29
DistilGPT2BF161.14x72.4263.43
DistilGPT2FP321.49x146.3898.36
Flan-T5 SmallBF160.84x54.3964.74
Flan-T5 SmallFP320.89x107.25120.25
GraphGPS (Peptides)BF161.12x45.7440.90
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP321.08x43.0839.80
MobileNetV3BF160.97x82.1984.66
MobileNetV3FP320.89x100.98113.22

Related Comparisons

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

Measure your own machine: pip install lynxbench-ai Β· Install guide β†’

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 faster than the DGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10) for AI?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 scores 4.99x the DGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10) overall (Training 5.59x, Inference 5.41x, Compute 3.30x).
Where is the difference between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 and the DGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10) largest?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the ratio is highest on Flan-T5 Small at BF16 (Training), where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 scores 8.39x the DGX Spark (NVIDIA GB10), and lowest on Dense MatMul at FP32 (Compute), at 2.31x.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started