Leaderboard Β· All comparisons Β· LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition vs NVIDIA H100 NVL for AI

Device pages: NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition Β· NVIDIA H100 NVL

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition scores 1.04x the NVIDIA H100 NVL overall (Training 1.00x, Inference 1.07x, Compute 1.05x).

Scores on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Ratio = the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition's score divided by the H100 NVL's
ScoreRatioRTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server EditionH100 NVL
Overall (GT)1.04x718.86692.67
Training1.00x587.80588.50
Inference1.07x1201.041123.94
Compute1.05x366.56347.75

Per Model and Precision

Sustained throughput per model and precision; ratio = RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition / H100 NVL
ModelPrecisionRatioRTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server EditionH100 NVL
compute
Dense MatMulBF161.07x764.15715.56
Dense MatMulFP161.07x746.60696.38
Dense MatMulFP321.05x744.41706.80
Dense MatMulFP640.05x11.31240.90
Sparse MatMulFP321.87x266.83143.02
Sparse MatMulFP640.78x198.15254.53
inference
DistilBERTFP161.21x2078.751714.39
DistilBERTFP81.51x1380.25912.88
DistilBERTINT81.60x1153.13720.85
DistilGPT2FP160.83x1733.832084.27
DistilGPT2FP80.82x976.681194.18
DistilGPT2INT81.00x953.43954.30
Flan-T5 SmallFP161.12x2611.392327.68
Flan-T5 SmallFP80.93x1263.891356.97
Flan-T5 SmallINT81.15x1093.17947.28
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP160.79x594.99748.98
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP80.80x295.47368.62
GraphGPS (Peptides)INT80.84x287.57341.34
MobileNetV3FP161.36x2973.562187.52
MobileNetV3INT81.06x731.67692.80
training
DistilBERTBF160.92x861.84940.17
DistilBERTFP321.12x1212.771081.01
DistilGPT2BF160.86x451.21522.66
DistilGPT2FP320.96x867.54903.48
Flan-T5 SmallBF160.94x494.04523.52
Flan-T5 SmallFP321.01x904.71898.75
GraphGPS (Peptides)BF160.94x336.85357.80
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP321.02x325.28318.48
MobileNetV3BF161.24x302.88243.47
MobileNetV3FP321.02x548.88537.67

Related Comparisons

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

Measure your own machine: pip install lynxbench-ai Β· Install guide β†’

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

Is the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 for AI?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition scores 1.20x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 overall (Training 1.14x, Inference 1.22x, Compute 1.31x).
Where is the difference between the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 largest?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the ratio is highest on Dense MatMul at FP32 (Compute), where the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition scores 2.08x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, and lowest on Sparse MatMul at FP32 (Compute), at 0.88x.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started