Native Linux

Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)

Intel · GPU · LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, recorded 2026-10-21

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) ranks 38 of 44 devices overall with a GT of 7.53 (Training 6.67, rank 40; Inference 8.85, rank 38; Compute 8.82, rank 38); overall it scores 0.01x the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 and 0.02x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.

7.53
GT · rank #38 of 44

Where It Sits on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Rank among all 44 devices; further right is higher.

  • Overall (GT)rank 38 of 44
  • Trainingrank 40 of 44
  • Inferencerank 38 of 44
  • Computerank 38 of 44
The Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U)'s score divided by the reference device's score
Compared withOverallTrainingInferenceCompute
NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM30.01x0.01x0.01x0.02x
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 40900.02x0.02x0.01x0.02x
Nearest devices on each score, with this device's score divided by theirs
ScoreNext aboveRatioNext belowRatio
Training NVIDIA GeForce MX5500.78x DGX Spark (Cortex-X925)1.16x
Inference Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)0.51x DGX Spark (Cortex-X925)1.26x
Compute Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)0.41x AMD Ryzen 5 9600X1.39x
  • Did not execute: FP8 inference (scored zero).

training

6.67 category score
Model Precision Sustained
MobileNetV3 FP32 7.24
MobileNetV3 BF16 5.55
Flan-T5 Small FP32 10.79
Flan-T5 Small BF16 5.81
DistilGPT2 FP32 10.57
DistilGPT2 BF16 4.88
DistilBERT FP32 12.27
DistilBERT BF16 6.30
GraphGPS (Peptides) FP32 4.81
GraphGPS (Peptides) BF16 1.83

inference

8.85 category score
Model Precision Sustained
MobileNetV3 FP16 20.55
MobileNetV3 INT8 6.76
Flan-T5 Small FP16 19.87
Flan-T5 Small INT8 13.87
Flan-T5 Small FP8 0.00
DistilGPT2 FP16 15.94
DistilGPT2 INT8 9.90
DistilGPT2 FP8 0.03
DistilBERT FP16 14.83
DistilBERT INT8 10.73
DistilBERT FP8 0.02
GraphGPS (Peptides) FP16 7.19
GraphGPS (Peptides) INT8 5.22
GraphGPS (Peptides) FP8 0.22

compute

8.82 category score
Model Precision Sustained
Dense MatMul FP32 4.59
Dense MatMul FP16 2.45
Dense MatMul BF16 2.46
Dense MatMul FP64 0.49
Sparse MatMul FP32 46.61
Sparse MatMul FP64 4.21

LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index · GT = LynxBenchAI Global Score. Every precision result is sustained throughput under a declared, bounded optimisation budget — no collapsed single number below the category level.

Compare With

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

All comparisons →

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

How fast is the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) for AI workloads?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) ranks 38 of 44 devices overall with a GT of 7.53 (Training 6.67, rank 40; Inference 8.85, rank 38; Compute 8.82, rank 38); overall it scores 0.01x the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 and 0.02x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
How does the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) compare with the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) scores 0.01x the NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 overall: Training 0.01x, Inference 0.01x, Compute 0.02x.
How does the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) compare with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) scores 0.02x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 overall: Training 0.02x, Inference 0.01x, Compute 0.02x.
Which precisions did the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) not run?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U) did not execute FP8 inference; those results score zero rather than being left out.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Measure your own Intel Graphics (Intel Core Ultra 7 165U): pip install lynxbench-ai · Install guide →

← Back to the leaderboard

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started