Leaderboard Β· All comparisons Β· LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER for AI

Device pages: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Β· NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 scores 1.01x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER overall (Training 1.01x, Inference 1.03x, Compute 0.99x). It leads on Training and Inference and trails on Compute.

Scores on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Ratio = the RTX 4080's score divided by the RTX 4080 SUPER's
ScoreRatioRTX 4080RTX 4080 SUPER
Overall (GT)1.01x338.13333.29
Training1.01x250.74247.68
Inference1.03x487.16474.50
Compute0.99x290.01291.82

Per Model and Precision

Sustained throughput per model and precision; ratio = RTX 4080 / RTX 4080 SUPER
ModelPrecisionRatioRTX 4080RTX 4080 SUPER
compute
Dense MatMulBF161.00x193.72194.08
Dense MatMulFP161.00x194.44194.26
Dense MatMulFP321.00x193.11192.95
Dense MatMulFP641.00x4.854.87
Sparse MatMulFP321.02x618.18608.42
Sparse MatMulFP640.96x475.98498.30
inference
DistilBERTFP160.93x679.07733.51
DistilBERTFP81.10x507.14461.01
DistilBERTINT81.14x459.23404.01
DistilGPT2FP160.93x633.84681.78
DistilGPT2FP80.94x412.17436.57
DistilGPT2INT80.96x410.40428.57
Flan-T5 SmallFP160.94x909.89972.75
Flan-T5 SmallFP80.99x656.48662.35
Flan-T5 SmallINT81.02x483.70472.69
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP160.96x237.93248.92
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP80.95x120.37126.93
GraphGPS (Peptides)INT81.03x120.89117.43
MobileNetV3FP161.25x1348.901082.65
MobileNetV3INT81.16x353.93305.45
training
DistilBERTBF160.95x305.83322.97
DistilBERTFP320.93x400.90430.72
DistilGPT2BF160.94x180.52192.02
DistilGPT2FP320.92x301.44327.51
Flan-T5 SmallBF161.01x205.83203.49
Flan-T5 SmallFP320.97x346.81359.22
GraphGPS (Peptides)BF161.34x162.59121.58
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP321.07x129.29121.12
MobileNetV3BF161.05x226.33215.50
MobileNetV3FP321.05x338.31321.34

Related Comparisons

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

Measure your own machine: pip install lynxbench-ai Β· Install guide β†’

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER for AI?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 scores 0.94x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER overall (Training 1.14x, Inference 1.07x, Compute 0.46x). It leads on Training and Inference and trails on Compute.
Where is the difference between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER largest?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the ratio is highest on MobileNetV3 at FP16 (Inference), where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 scores 1.48x the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, and lowest on Sparse MatMul at FP64 (Compute), at 0.21x.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started