Leaderboard Β· All comparisons Β· LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT vs Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) for AI

Device pages: AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT Β· Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)

On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT scores 4.82x the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H) overall (Training 3.05x, Inference 7.07x, Compute 5.19x). The two runs used different platforms (native Linux and WSL).

Scores on the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index

Ratio = the Radeon RX 9060 XT's score divided by the Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)'s
ScoreRatioRadeon RX 9060 XTIntel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)
Overall (GT)4.82x76.3215.82
Training3.05x37.2812.24
Inference7.07x122.7317.36
Compute5.19x112.6221.68
  • Runs on the Radeon RX 9060 XT only: FP8 inference.

Per Model and Precision

Sustained throughput per model and precision; ratio = Radeon RX 9060 XT / Intel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)
ModelPrecisionRatioRadeon RX 9060 XTIntel Graphics [0x7d55] (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H)
compute
Dense MatMulBF1627.35x121.194.43
Dense MatMulFP1618.27x120.866.61
Dense MatMulFP320.59x7.4212.55
Dense MatMulFP642.65x2.681.01
Sparse MatMulFP321.81x210.90116.25
Sparse MatMulFP6420.91x178.558.54
inference
DistilBERTFP166.90x241.4135.01
DistilBERTFP8664.71x132.060.20
DistilBERTINT86.01x130.1521.65
DistilGPT2FP167.02x283.5940.38
DistilGPT2FP8555.59x153.380.28
DistilGPT2INT86.85x149.0421.76
Flan-T5 SmallFP1610.45x433.4041.49
Flan-T5 SmallFP8n/a196.70not run
Flan-T5 SmallINT85.93x165.4127.89
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP164.77x72.8315.26
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP8n/a35.86not run
GraphGPS (Peptides)INT834.20x35.551.04
MobileNetV3FP161.90x83.6244.10
MobileNetV3INT82.48x32.3313.06
training
DistilBERTBF167.10x96.0213.52
DistilBERTFP320.56x15.4827.75
DistilGPT2BF168.27x72.638.78
DistilGPT2FP320.60x13.5922.61
Flan-T5 SmallBF166.94x75.9410.95
Flan-T5 SmallFP321.14x24.7821.71
GraphGPS (Peptides)BF165.60x16.863.01
GraphGPS (Peptides)FP321.97x16.908.58
MobileNetV3BF163.10x27.508.88
MobileNetV3FP324.94x39.528.00

Related Comparisons

Each figure is the first device's overall score divided by the second's.

Measure your own machine: pip install lynxbench-ai Β· Install guide β†’

How to Read These Results

A LynxBenchAI score is sustained throughput on a fixed catalogue of PyTorch models, measured after a warm-up at a batch size raised until throughput stops improving, so it is what the machine holds under load, not its best instant. Training, Inference and Compute are three separate scores; GT combines them (Training and Inference weigh 0.4 each, Compute 0.2).

Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

Scores compare only within one Index: the 26Q3 Index fixes the models, precisions, correctness thresholds and scoring, and a later Index may change them. Each test is one timed window, the scores have no 0-100 scale, and a precision a device cannot run scores zero rather than being skipped.

LynxBenchAI is built by TechnoLynx, which the European Commission engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking (case study).

Questions

Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti faster than the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT for AI?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti scores 1.91x the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT overall (Training 3.57x, Inference 1.95x, Compute 0.55x). It leads on Training and Inference and trails on Compute.
Where is the difference between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT largest?
On the LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index, the ratio is highest on DistilBERT at FP32 (Training), where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti scores 13.33x the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT, and lowest on Sparse MatMul at FP64 (Compute), at 0.25x.
What does this result tell me about my own PyTorch model?
Every run uses the stock, publicly released PyTorch stack, so a result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. It does not run your own model, and it is not a vendor-tuned peak like an MLPerf submission.

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started