LynxBenchAICompute Leaderboard

The same PyTorch models on the stock, publicly released stack, every device measured the same way, from a laptop GPU to a data-centre accelerator.

LynxBenchAI 26Q3 Index Β· 44 devices, one methodology

The 26Q3 Compute Leaderboard

Ranked by the compute score. What the scores measure ↓ Β· Head-to-head comparisons β†’

# Device Accelerator / GPU GT Global Score Training Category Inference Category Compute Category Platform OS
1
986.72
727.23
1304.04
1023.28
Native Linux
2
1277.42
1080.48
2105.93
624.58
Native Linux
3
1156.14
817.03
2166.65
617.19
Native Linux
4
1306.35
1089.67
2224.55
611.10
Native Linux
5
939.45
709.35
1678.11
487.13
Native Linux
6
1044.99
811.98
1914.61
480.83
Native Linux
7
450.05
335.94
659.37
367.89
Native Linux
8
718.86
587.80
1201.04
366.56
Native Linux
9
692.67
588.50
1123.94
347.75
Native Linux
10
395.82
316.04
528.12
344.33
Native Linux
11
388.24
309.83
517.93
338.18
Native Linux
12
606.24
484.04
1039.63
306.52
Native Linux
13
333.29
247.68
474.50
291.82
Native Linux
14
338.13
250.74
487.16
290.01
Native Linux
15
597.49
515.26
985.84
279.64
Native Linux
16
545.71
470.34
891.80
261.39
WSL
17
279.63
212.24
407.87
223.26
Native Linux
18
440.29
415.55
660.97
210.04
Native Linux
19
403.38
387.30
584.07
201.12
Native Linux
20
213.06
165.01
283.82
197.45
WSL
21
201.71
154.20
297.87
154.66
Native Linux
22
311.78
282.72
509.65
133.53
Native Linux
23
265.94
238.00
435.59
116.71
Native Linux
24
124.64
92.79
171.67
116.49
Native Linux
25
76.32
37.28
122.73
112.62
Native Linux

The Personal Edition submits your benchmark results to TechnoLynx's servers as part of participating in the public leaderboard. If that isn't acceptable for your use case, contact TechnoLynx about Press, Pro, or Enterprise licenses.

Get Started

What the Scores Measure

  • Training

    How fast the machine trains: sustained training throughput, iterations completed per second after warm-up, in FP32 and in BF16 mixed precision.

    Models MobileNetV3, Flan-T5 Small, DistilGPT2, DistilBERT, GraphGPS (Peptides)

    Precisions FP32, BF16

  • Inference

    How fast it serves a trained model: sustained inference throughput at reduced precisions. INT8 and FP8 quantise only the layers that allow it; the rest of the model stays at 16 bits.

    Models MobileNetV3, Flan-T5 Small, DistilGPT2, DistilBERT, GraphGPS (Peptides)

    Precisions FP16, FP8, INT8

  • Compute

    Raw tensor arithmetic under the same rules: dense and sparse matrix multiplication from double precision down to half precision.

    Models Dense MatMul, Sparse MatMul

    Precisions FP64, FP32, BF16, FP16

  • GT

    The overall rank: Training and Inference count 0.4 each, Compute 0.2. A failed or unsupported test scores zero and stays in. GT orders devices; it is not a percentage, and it compares only within one Index.

What each precision label means, and when a result counts β†’

Who Stands Behind the Figures

  • Advisor to the European Commission

    TechnoLynx was engaged as an independent expert advisor on AI performance and benchmarking for AI Gigafactories under the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking.

    Read the case study β†’
  • From CLBenchmark's Lead Programmer

    Our founder was lead programmer of CLBenchmark (later CompuBench CL), the cross-vendor OpenCL benchmark published from 2010, and sat on the Khronos OpenCL and SYCL working groups.

    CLBenchmark (archived) β†’
  • Same Rules for Every Vendor

    Each Index fixes the models, precisions and scoring before any device is measured, and every result, whoever submits it, goes through the same signed pipeline.

Design Principles

Why the figures look the way they do, and why they sit below vendor slides.

  • Stock PyTorch, Not a Tuned Peak

    A result is broadly indicative of the out-of-the-box PyTorch experience on that hardware, and so of custom PyTorch models too. MLPerf shows a vendor-tuned peak; this shows the stack your model will run on, which is why the figures sit below vendor slides.

  • One Scale, Laptop to Data Centre

    Small models, chosen to cover architecture types (a CNN, three kinds of transformer, a graph network), run on every device from integrated graphics up. Only the batch size grows, until throughput plateaus, so a laptop GPU and an accelerator are each measured at their own plateau and share one ranking.

  • No Vendor Path, No Free Omissions

    Models are prepared once, before any target device is known, and the same artefacts ship to every vendor. A workload that fails, or a precision a device cannot run, scores zero and stays in the total.

  • What It Holds Under Load, Not Its Best Instant

    A warm-up phase is discarded, then completed iterations are counted inside one continuous timed window. Burst and turbo behaviour does not set the score.

  • Hardware and Software, Measured Together

    Every result is bound to the device, the backend it ran through and the driver, framework and runtime on that machine. No score is attributed to silicon alone.

  • Speed Only Counts When the Answer Is Right

    Each precision has to pass a correctness threshold before its result counts, and throughput is weighted by the memory a run actually moves, so a lower precision has to earn its speed-up.

The full methodology β†’